9K58 Says:
Jun 20, 2008 - I am starting to love those british documentaries. Good correspondents, unbiased. And most importantly, they go to the heart of the problem, not affraid to go to dangerous zones.
mikiy84 Says:
Jun 23, 2008 - This is not right. Dispatches must recieve some sort of award because this guy risked his life to bring us this information. Mr Brown, i see you are critisizing Mr Mugabe, who himself is raping his country, but at the same time funding a coalition like this one. Make up your mind please Mr Brown
sadeq12 Says:
Jun 24, 2008 - ahmed deger is fukin nex door 2 me i hate him man i would ra shank him
niemanickurwa Says:
Jul 8, 2008 - Great, proud to be British... again.
niemanickurwa Says:
Jul 8, 2008 - Mugabe isn't playing by the "rules" though. Everyone knows anything is OK so long as you play ball with the west.
jareeere Says:
Jul 9, 2008 - fuck the correspondents he is fucking big mouth. i am going to kill him if i am ga"madheere.
jareeere Says:
Jul 9, 2008 - very very good correspondents . he is sick . he is not affraid why he went somalia is dangerouse. he is gd correspondents.
Jonchess Says:
Jul 19, 2008 - When Galloway brought this up in the House of Commons all the piggy MPs ran off to count their expenses.
kmarkymark Says:
Jul 22, 2008 - I would love to work at FCO, imagine the power to slaughter people without any shit coming back
sxb08 Says:
Jul 27, 2008 - holly shitt "most dangerous place on earth" somalia???
profit1 Says:
Jul 29, 2008 - serious next door?
zelem92 Says:
Aug 10, 2008 - 2nd most dangerous iraq is still first
SepticPsycho Says:
Aug 12, 2008 - So these guys have British passports. Just like the rest of the third world. Big deal. If the british goverment really wanted to fight islamic extremists, it would start by actually deporting them from Britain.
BARRACUDASILVER Says:
Aug 30, 2008 - biiiiiiiiiiitch.
omarhas Says:
Sep 1, 2008 - Ask what you can do for your country, not what your country can do for you! The international world is not going to do it for us; we need to do it for us. When are we going to realize this?
TOGDHEERboy Says:
Sep 5, 2008 - lool @ omarhas, You mean, "ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country".John F. Kennedy! Next time get it right. This video reflects on the growing ignorance levels in the Hawiya/Majarteen regions in Somalia. All Hawiya and Majarteens are war-lord, money hungry, blood sucking Sabertooth.
Libertarian333 Says:
Sep 6, 2008 - "MP or Congressional Representatives... urge them to take action." The competitive private secular and Islamic courts were NOT "rulers", they were private dispute resolution organizations. The Somalis were doing fine until western governments freaked out that their own citizens might notice that people can live peacefully and prosperously without a government. The Somali free market anarchy was infinitely more just and peaceful than any western mob rule democracy or corporatist military empire.
Libertarian333 Says:
Sep 6, 2008 - The warlords have been backed by the CIA, and probably British intelligence as well, for years. If it wasn't for western meddling, the warlords would've been wiped out long ago, and without the ongoing threat posed by the UN's repeated attempts to violently impose a government on the Somali people, there would've been no reason for the formerly competitive and independent Islamic courts to band together. Somalia would be at peace were it not for western government activities.
omarhas Says:
Sep 6, 2008 - Thanks man for correcting me, now let me correct you. Firstly i am not of these clans, secondly the war-lords in Somalia are off many clans. Lets stop this bigotry.
boognish100 Says:
Sep 8, 2008 - Did you actually read more than the first two lines of the my video description post on the right? I don't understand the logic of quoting that line, followed by what you said. Though the funding of the ARPCT by the CIA, fueling the conflict in Mogadishu is abhorrent, escalating the situation to something infinitely worse; to say Somalia were doing fine during the days of anarchy is naive.
Libertarian333 Says:
Sep 10, 2008 - I quoted that line because you seem to want action from the main source of their problems. They were doing fine. It wasn't perfect, but neither was what preceded it. Despite all the problems, most of them created by western government meddling, their standard of living was improving and their standards of justice were better than what most governments offer. Had they been allowed to continue without outside interference, they would be well on their way to becoming a first world country.
OnFiRe1993 Says:
Sep 28, 2008 - omg
hardsofty123 Says:
Oct 2, 2008 - The reason for the intervention is that the regime prior to the one installed would have supported and harboured jihadi fighters, since it was an islamic theocracy. Thats the reason for the intervention, same w/ afghanistan. The country now has some fundamental rights, but they lack stability(civilwar) that they may have had prior. they wouldnt have become a 1st world had they stayed an islamic state. U need foreign investment to develop the econ. WorldBank only gives to democracies.
kett82 Says:
Oct 9, 2008 - why do somalis get free houses and benefits in the UK? BAGS OF MAIZE AND HIV . MUD HUTS
daadiroowyare Says:
Jun 18, 2008 - It is not in your name (Britons) but in our name (Somalis), because unlike you we understand the price we should pay to avoid our country becoming safe heaven for terrorists and motiveless Islamist killers. The war being fought in your name is the Iraqi and Afghanistan wars where torture and indiscriminate killings are normal and taboo to talk about