bcpietsch Says:

Jun 13, 2007 - Crime of the century if this was covered up- i have pals who saw UFOs follow the 90 space shuttle in Florida...

NAlexo Says:

Jun 14, 2007 - Whoever is opinionated about the smoothness of camera's motion please remember: This is not America's Funniest Videos. These people were trained years for what they did. Moreover do you thnk they had Super 8 in their hands?

louwie1 Says:

Jun 14, 2007 - wooooow i never saw this one on tv before !

zrodn001 Says:

Jun 14, 2007 - whatever this is its a good story man either a good science fiction tale or hard core truth wow anyway i have heard that they nuked the evidence on the moon after they excavated and did there research for national security because other countries got space vehicles

zrodn001 Says:

Jun 14, 2007 - but dam a good fiction story or truth i got a fuckin headache but man nobody i know off and thats like thousands of normal people dont like trust the gov its a shame that congress in itself has been caught lying and cheating even on frontline and 60 minutes makes these stories somewhat plausible

Gekmdal Says:

Jun 15, 2007 - if we can clearly see the side of the moon that faces the earth, why would we explore it? The moon is so bright, and telescopes so strong that we can make out anything. If there is something on the moon, it would be on the dark side.

thieu4u Says:

Jun 15, 2007 - Dear sir. The first thing that struck me in this video was the monolith kind of stone in one of the rooms. If this video is real thaall the other apollo flights where pointed to other structures. It would be rediculous to find ruïns of a ancient civilisation in the first flight and than go collecting rocks with the other apollo missions. I remember very well that befor going to the moon, satelites went to the moon to make very well pictures of the surface..1 / 4

thieu4u Says:

Jun 15, 2007 - So, if there where ruins, or buildings, they had all the information before they determined the landingplaces. Very probable, Stanley Kubrick must have known about it and in his movie 2001 he alreaddy sended the message to the world that they found traces of a old civilisation of 5000000 years as I remember well. And in that movie, we see the monolith. If he and the writer of the book Arthur Clarke knew that nasa discovered ruins on the moon... 2/4

thieu4u Says:

Jun 15, 2007 - they could have based the whole story on this facts. In a way they could have prepaired the whole world alreaddy for these proves of live elswhere in the universe with the in 1971 mind blowing movie 2001, that influenced my artistic work deeply. I hope that you have more video stuff of the other landings. PS. Is it possible that this video is so smooth because they shot probably with more than 24 pictures a second. 3/4

thieu4u Says:

Jun 15, 2007 - You can see this clearly when the astronaut is traying to collect some rocks and debri at the end. I have the feeling that you see clearly that it is slow motion. I can not wait to see the next video. If this is true, I start to understand why the astronauts, who where my herous in those days, disapeared very soon out of the in the media and lived suddenly a different live. Keep up the good work. Greetings from Belgium. Mathieu. 4/4

thegreatestchallenge Says:

Jun 16, 2007 - u do make sense, actually why would a civilisation travel such a long journey across light-years to do nothing on the moon? books of past, like bible, claims that ancient men can built tower of babel to reach the sky, indian texts also talked about flying machines, thus ancient men may not be so stupid after all.

Sadochrist Says:

Jun 16, 2007 - the moon spins at a rate that is timed so that the side of the moon that you see is always there... in Australia you'd see the opposite side of the moon but you'd only ever see that side.

brshelton000 Says:

Jun 18, 2007 - I agree. If you were on the moon in a low-gravity environment filming the ruins of an alien civilization, would you hop around like an idiot or take slow, methodical steps to ensure good camerawork.

NAlexo Says:

Jun 18, 2007 - The missions that followed did not involve collecting rocks, rather explorations of other sites with remnants (including the obelisc zone). There were over 20,000 photos of them taken before Apollo 11 landing.

NAlexo Says:

Jun 18, 2007 - It is a well know fact that Hollywood tests for the public's pulse (War of the Worlds, The Day that Earth Stood Still, E.T., Star Wars, Fire in the Sky, Communion, Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Signs). What matters to the Army is not

NAlexo Says:

Jun 18, 2007 - whether we react to them but how. Accordingly favored propagandas are formed and delivered.

NAlexo Says:

Jun 18, 2007 - Thank you for your sincere and thoughtful feedback Mathieu.

TheTimeTraveller Says:

Jun 19, 2007 - Why are we only seeing this now? Surely there would have been more stuff said about the existance of a base on the Moon, now who would set that up? Could be evidence of us being monitered years ago (all those old pictures and sculptered Disk shaped objects) though what the hell would have happened to them, and did they come from Mars, or somewhre further.

lightfoot500 Says:

Jun 19, 2007 - wow, pretty bizarre, NAlexo,,, where did you get this? the other lunar shots, if i recall, were more clear and distinct, these are fuzzy. i was a kid when the first guy stepped on the moon. but astronauts can definitly be seen in a couple of frames. if i was an astronaut filming this, i would have to clean out my jockeys when i was done filming.

thieu4u Says:

Jun 20, 2007 - Dear Sir. I whould like to know when exactly these moonstructures where observed for the first time. The mounth palamor 250 cm reflector lens could have made very good pictures of the moon from the 1920st. If there was alreaddy convincing evidence in those day's than this information could have triggered organisations as the Amerikan Interplanetary Society 1930, the BIS 1933 the VIR, GRID etc. The BIS attracted many later famous SF writers. Thanks. Mathieu.

NAlexo Says:

Jun 20, 2007 - The fuzziness and background hiss are my faults. I m not a media expert and these are from posting it here by any means necessary.

luxeden Says:

Jun 20, 2007 - So who visited the moon before us?

luxeden Says:

Jun 20, 2007 - There is no pyramid in these shapes although aliens seem to like pyramid monuments

NAlexo Says:

Jun 20, 2007 - NATO says there are 57 races documented. The moon could have easily been a relay station.

NAlexo Says:

Jun 20, 2007 - For early pyramids look at Mars' surface