a7x4evr631 Says:

Nov 26, 2008 - "24 kW of power a day" That doesn't even make sense. A watt is defined as a joule per second. In other words, it's a rate of transfer of energy. To say it produces 24 kJ per second per day just doesn't mean anything. It's like saying a stream of water has a rate of 1 liter/sec per day. (Also it doesn't make sense to say you "buy a kilowatt.") They could have either meant 24 kW of power, or 24 kJ of energy per day. In any case, somebody doesn't know what they're talking about.

BruceNolanMN Says:

Nov 26, 2008 - "for example you invent & build a craft that travels at Mach 1000" If I have actually achieved such a thing where no one else has, I would apply for a patent and DEMONSTRATE it doing what I say it can do. If I can send a grain of sand from Paris to Sydney in 1 minute, FedEx would make me the richest man before the patent is official. Then again, perhaps I would hope that I could still get rich as the original inventor of the public domain invention.

BruceNolanMN Says:

Nov 26, 2008 - So you ARE saying that it is only greed that has stopped the invention of what virtually every physicist says is impossible. It's not the "impossible" part that needs to be overcome, it's the "greed"? So, why, if this Aussie has a working model already, for what does he need the billion dollars?

FreeGlobalEnergy Says:

Nov 26, 2008 - So you wouldnt give it away? You would patent it. Did you know NASA & the Pentagon would contact you? Did you know such a craft is a threat to National security in a citizens hands? The pentagon has a record for locking down inventions, sending you on your way then developing it secretly. You would demonstrate it. On the news? In my life I have seen many demonstrated on TV News to never be seen on the market, you are naive of the power of the Corporation

FreeGlobalEnergy Says:

Nov 26, 2008 - I dont know, perhaps you should direct that question to yourself as these are your comments: ¨I would apply for a patent and DEMONSTRATE it - perhaps I would hope that I could still get rich as the original inventor of the public domain invention.¨

BruceNolanMN Says:

Nov 26, 2008 - I don't expect him to give it away, but if he already has a working model, it doesn't cost a billion dollars to get a patent. There are also ways to get rich on an invention which you release into the public domain. At least one of these inventors must have been smart enough to figure out how to get rich in addition to figuring out how to break the known laws of the universe. We're talking about a paradigm shift like nothing else in history. "Rich" will have new meaning in the new paradigm.

BruceNolanMN Says:

Nov 26, 2008 - Since it's unlikely that they actually know what they're talking about, based on the improbability of their claims. But they probably meant 24 kWh per day.

ytamel Says:

Nov 27, 2008 - As an engineer i am very positive about this invention but my only question is how would it compensate the losses due to friction. Also the conservation of momentum and energy is a question for me.Otherwise its a revolutionary invention and must be studied independently and should be commercialized and put it in use.

tamaramj Says:

Nov 28, 2008 - Energy conversion alway causes losses, and this device converts it twice ? HELLO ?? ignoring the hard fact that you have friction and electrical resistance in the coils to overcome ? Hey you can build it 10000 times more tricky than this, but you need to understand that you do not actually want to convert power, you want to convert WORK, which is power over time. W=P*t Let it run for some time and see it consuming 102 Ws by giving off just 100 Ws useless, sorry

FreeGlobalEnergy Says:

Nov 28, 2008 - Supposedly with most of these there is a measurable current applied. Apparently the magnets provide the extra boost, Apparently at present there is no way to measure the magnetic boost or energy which is why they seem to be Over-Unity when in fact nobody ever considers this un-measurable magnetic energy. (supposedly)

FreeGlobalEnergy Says:

Nov 28, 2008 - There are periods in science history where certain things were a mystery until the proper tools or technology were developed to then test & document as proof. Such as the mystery of bee flight required the digital camera to understand wing movement, I think the same applies here. I am not ready to dis-mis this machine as an elaborate hoax

01supersnake Says:

Nov 30, 2008 - hummmm people once thought the earth was flat!!! it was impossible for to fly!!!we could never reach the moon!!! come on people we don't know everything there is to know in this world or universe .scientists are always rewriting laws,new discoveries happen everyday and sometime those prove old ideas and laws wrong

Magnetmotorman Says:

Nov 30, 2008 - This is an overunity machine I have designed a magnet motor that does not need shielding and does not need any help to start rotating with a battery or by hand and is not a clam shell stator. mine will produce without stopping 25KW in the following demensions 12" dia by 25" long! I have configured a much better Unit. I commend you for your efforts I AM SEEKING FUNDING FOR MY UNIT. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN INVESTING $25,000 FOR THE FIRST PROTOTYPE THEN CONTACT ME AT thefuturenow4u at yahoo

FreeGlobalEnergy Says:

Nov 30, 2008 - It will never make it to the mainstream. When I study Stanley Meyers & others, You will be blocked every step of the way. It will never be allowed to be available to the world wide masses. Fascist America is among the worst place to try to market it. Japan seems to be the free´er society for these things as the Japanese have openly created Stanley Myers invention - The Water Car

Magnetmotorman Says:

Nov 30, 2008 - Wrong, this time those who would try to block this, will be blocked themselves!!!

FreeGlobalEnergy Says:

Nov 30, 2008 - What force exists today that is more powerful than the oil industry, The Federal Government, The City & State Governments, the courts and the backwards scientific community? Are you really the type that does not learn from others mistakes or are you the type that has to learn everything the hard way?

glassglowz Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - Where can I get one? Or did the oil companies have him killed?

BruceNolanMN Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - I would assume that such an invention would gain the attention of the government, if it actually did what I claim. Today I could demonstrate on the web in too many places for it to be kept secret. In ways that are way to fast to be intercepted by the govt, I would send video to multiple news agencies around the world. But "they" would probably already be monitoring my research and would kill me before I got close to building a working model to demo anyway. Why do you even search for such things?

BruceNolanMN Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - One major difference between these machines and the "bee flight" dilemma is that bees are actually observed flying. No one seems to be able to produce a device like this that can be observed doing what is claimed. If there was such an observable dilemma, THEN you could suppose that we don't seem to possess the tools to test and document how they work. Until such observation is made, why worry about tools to understand what apparently doesn't exist.

BruceNolanMN Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - Granted we know practically zero about the universe. That's all well and good. But that's like saying there's a pink elephant sanctuary near the center of the sun and one day maybe we'll have the understanding of the universe to prove it. A lack of observable phenomena and a lack of understanding of how to create such phenomena does not make such phenomena possible. That's where God exists.

BruceNolanMN Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - If you can power my house for a month with this machine alone, I'll pay that amount. I'll demand no pre-existing patents or patents pending. I'll require no rights to the design in any way. I require only that it is no internal combustion, solar, or wind generator, it uses no external fuel, it costs nothing to run indefinitely, and produces an excess of at least 10KWH for 30 consecutive 24 hour days at my house installed under my supervision.

BruceNolanMN Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - I don't get it, FreeGlobalEnergy. If such a device will always be blocked by the most powerful in the world, why do you bother searching for such devices? The only claimed devices that you could possibly find are ones that the oil industry has deemed to be not a threat, and all working devices are concealed behind an impenetrable cloak, your search is pointless.

FreeGlobalEnergy Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - Because I know how to get it to the masses in such a way no Government can stop it.

FreeGlobalEnergy Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - The usual legal blocks, someone told me he is selling to another company. Could be a buy out company related to Oil Corp who will shelve the technology

FreeGlobalEnergy Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - Only within the narrow confines of your own brain