mlsmodmusic Says:

Nov 3, 2008 - Another point I would like to bring up is that, sure, it looks good... but im sure this isn't something they threw together and said "hey look what we did!". They probably spent a long time working on this face to impress people. But Imagine them trying to do it this beautifully for a game like grand theft auto or elder scrolls. Even for a smaller game, it wont happen anytime soon.

eXtremestrike Says:

Nov 3, 2008 - umm if you read into this more you might have realized that it is a simple procedure that involves very little time, hence it will replace the old technique

mlsmodmusic Says:

Nov 4, 2008 - hmmm i see what you mean. I saw another video of it and the process.... but I would still like to know how they would render entire levels...

mobucks2006 Says:

Nov 6, 2008 - actually the company has done work for the GTA games

mlsmodmusic Says:

Nov 7, 2008 - but did they use this system?

Nathiestx Says:

Nov 7, 2008 - I agree it looked like shit.

SarahLee1 Says:

Nov 7, 2008 - For everyone bashing this; I would like to see you do better.

theadamant1328 Says:

Nov 9, 2008 - no, because the consols dont have to power to run that high quality of images. theres an article on it in the november GI.

gfreak220 Says:

Nov 11, 2008 - wow it's unbelievable how people don't appreciate some incredible work and still find a way to bash it. this is a truly innovative step forward for gaming just watch the next gen consoles are going to be really close to having this kind power

Crozonexz Says:

Nov 12, 2008 - Holy crap this is to real....

dudeman2690 Says:

Nov 14, 2008 - It is rather fantastic work. However, one thing throws it and only if you're looking for it. Her eyebrows. When looking closely between the digital and real faces, they look slightly different.

kidkidder Says:

Nov 14, 2008 - Well technically they could change the face to a demon or an alien by using the motion data captured then applying some effects to her face to make her look completely different.

K1LLSWITCH Says:

Nov 14, 2008 - This video was shown in my animation class last week and I was stunned when I first seen this. Amazing!

horbigast Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - It's very clear that you can NOT believe what you see anymore...

PlikDeluxe Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - until i read the descrip, i didnt know any better than a real women on you tube

Dakkben Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - holy shit, its so real...

alexcandy1411 Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Wtf "looked like shit". Pseudoscience, you "think" and you "wanted" it to look like shit so you can bash it. Face it, it looks pretty damn real.

uiralamour Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - Dont forget, just the face is cg...same as in baby 8), but that`s a nice motion capture, and its less expensive!

zNinjaAttack Says:

Nov 19, 2008 - can you say, running man? lol

zachariot Says:

Nov 22, 2008 - o ok i can see now. her face is cg at 1:09 and real at 1:30. u can tell the difference cos of the colour and light.

prototype1115 Says:

Nov 26, 2008 - .. WTF!!!! dude ..... this generation rules F**K YOU 20TH CENTURY!!

SpeedMetal4635 Says:

Nov 27, 2008 - O.O incredible, shit, the technology scare me

joystickhero01 Says:

Nov 28, 2008 - i 2nd that!!!!!1

Moongalz Says:

Nov 28, 2008 - the mouth area looks really fake...rest is good.

MRDaubuisson Says:

Dec 1, 2008 - I though she was CG