India's vote against Sri Lanka was bewildering: Chandrika Kumaratunga

1982mockingbird1982 Says:

Apr 13, 2012 - Im sorry but when was the last time a mob of Tamils took to the streets and started burning Sinhalese people alive?...Thats right never. And when was the last time a MAJORITY of Tamils supported the LTTE while they killed civilians?...Again the answer is never, not even after the 2009 massacre and not even after Black July. Who need to look up the defition of racist And Tamils are just as native to the island as Sinhalese. If anything Indo-Aryan culture is more foreign to SL. Not that it matters

1982mockingbird1982 Says:

Apr 14, 2012 - Im disappointed in her. I always thought she was conscientious and uncompromising when it cam to human rights. So I cant understand why she would oppose India's decision to just acknowledge what happened to the victims of the 2009 massacre. This resolution doesn't even impose sanctions or anything so it doesnt harm SL's national interests. And even if it did the rights of inidvidual beings are still more important than the interests of a country

Ddd tyhedude Says:

Apr 14, 2012 - 95% of the tamils supported LTTE & Tamils killed 100 times more Sinhalese than the amount of tamils tht Sinhalse killed ! If Eng belong to English,SL belong to Sinhalese & we are the natives,no point in aruing as its well known.Tamils are just a 10% minority,they r immigrants and if they don`t like us they can go back to where they come from.SL army did a great job by wiping these terrorists and I wont complain if they kick out the rest too!.Sinhalse have been too kind for those blood suckers !

1982mockingbird1982 Says:

Apr 14, 2012 - Ok everything youve just said is false. But why dont you cite your scources for these statistics and historical theories? If 95% of Tamils supported LTTE, the LTTE would have far more resources and man power and at least 50% of Tamils would profess to support them. Also if your trying to tell me that an Indo-Aryan language just sprung up in an Island in the middle of South Asia then you are insulting my intelligence. BTW the Mahavasma is not historically acurate.

1982mockingbird1982 Says:

Apr 14, 2012 - Anyone who so bitterly opposes the LTTE but then supports the SL governement is the worst kind of hypocrit. They didnt start the war, and their crimes pale in comparison to the atrocities committed by the government and its nationalist and buddhist supremacist constituents. But these people care more about their countries image than human rights and have no problem playing the terrorist card to cover up state terrorism

joes lopaz Says:

Apr 14, 2012 - woooo... why you missed 1987-1989 period...??? where were you during that period?? As your user name..If you are a real sinhalese(I hope not), you should be proud of the man who lead the army to a victory over brutal terror lasted for 30 Yrs.. I cannot imagine U'r mother has fed u up with milk of her own created by Sinhala Blood.

dinapoli123 Says:

May 7, 2012 - India dont understand, Sinhalese + tamils dont work . Tamils is hindu facists racists and Sinhalese is peacefull loving buddists.

Steve Smith Says:

May 7, 2012 - Historically Sinhala leaders before come to power talk sweet. When in power become evil. Her Father brought 24h Sinhala only policy, Her mother brought university entrance policy discriminating She destroyed the Norway peace initiative. these racist Chauvinistic leaders are all against minority Tamil Hindus who lived in Lankai longer than Orissa immigrant. Sinhala may be majority have no authority to kill all the minorities with impunity.India should intervene and sort out the aggressors.

Steve Smith Says:

May 7, 2012 - Bullshit, you are the racist!!!! You started in 1915 with Muslims. 1951 with Indian estate Tamil workers who were backbone for the Sri Lanka economy even today. You continue to kill Tamils even today. You beg the world to kill Tamils. Your attitude to Tamils sucks!!

dinapoli123 Says:

May 7, 2012 - If what your saying is true, why can tamil people just say they are sri lankans? why they need to put "Tamil" in everything they do?. Tamil parties, Tamil alliance, and so on, do you think any other races would like to vote on a party called "tamil" or "white" Party . You see ...Its diffecoult for Non tamils to motivate to give 10 % of a countries population own rule, own state 33 % of the landmass...to a people , cos they claim for 400 years ago they got cheated by the british .

Steve Smith Says:

May 7, 2012 - When British was there the first political party against British was called Ceylon workers congress. All the educated Tamils were fighting shoulder to shoulder with Sinhala people. From Sir Pon Ramanathan, Laksman Kathirgamar and even Karuna to date helped when you are in trouble. Which Sinhala leader helped tamils when they were killed since 1958? Racism started with majority due ro Tamils success. Separation is caused by your ignorance, Please sort yourself out before you blame us..

Steve Smith Says:

May 7, 2012 - DINAPOLI __ Not 400 ears ago FYI!!! British created Ceylon in 1833(Jaffnapattnam+Kotae+Kandy) brought under one administration as a test case. Whent the Flag was agreed your leaders disregarded all the Muslims and Tamils. Tamils & Muslims have to fight for the Orange &green on the side for the flag. After independent in 1972 you change the name to Sri Lanka(Appe Ratae) denied university entrance to Tamils & Muslims. This is why Tamil congress & Muslim Congress.We are more Sri Lankan!!

dinapoli123 Says:

May 7, 2012 - In a democraty , mayority rule. Go to Romania and ask a seperate state for your gypsys that is around 10 % of the pop , indian ancestors.. Do you think they will even laugh? . Tamils are around 10 % in sri lanka, There homeland is Tamil nadu, there are there fellow brothers and sisters, who speak there language, looks like them, . That is the ONLY homeland they have . If they like they can stay in sri lanka, but they shuld obay the sinhalese people and our 2500 years of buddist culture.

Steve Smith Says:

May 8, 2012 - Tamil land is stolen by you.Its given to you on a plate by Great British believing that you will respect all But history so far is Unpunished state terrorism & murder. Your attitude is true reflection of what has and will happen to the minority in L. This is the root cause of the problem. No equality. You do not ,never understand what is democracy is. Wold community should act quickly put off this Hitler attitude.Before the Buddist culture there was Hindu Ravana who worshiped Shiva.Ru Racist?

rahulrj7 Says:

Jul 25, 2012 - really ashamed to see such a reply by a common sri lankan!!!! :( its all politics dividing people...why should people go with it!!!

dinapoli123 Says:

Jul 26, 2012 - Its not all politics, Tamils dont wants to learn the mayority peoples language. Even if i would have been born tamil in india i shuld and need to learn hindi ..to fit into the socitiy. Cos mayority people speak it. Tamils in sri lanka...they dont wants...they wants an independet "racial clean state" with only tamils. not sinhalese, or muslims...that is there strategy,.

silvasaman23 Says:

Sep 20, 2012 - The "Tamil Land" that you talk about was all Sinhalese before Tamil invaders from South India stole it during Tamil invasions.And don't even start with that bogus Tamil homeland theory.Not a SINGLE SHRED of evidence(archaeological,documentary or otherwise)has ever been found to prove such a myth.It was lie created by Tamil racist politicians of the 1920s.

silvasaman23 Says:

Sep 20, 2012 - Tamils have not lived longer than Sinhalese in Sri lanka-not a shred of evidence to prove that stop lying.Tamil migration only starts after 2nd century BC as traders from South India.Then as invaders.Present Jaffna kingdom only dates from 14th century after kalingha magha invasion.Sinhalese have the unique language and culture of Sri lanka.Sinhalese created the civilisation of Sri Lanka.Tamil cultural contribution is also accepted and respected.But Tamil contribution must be placed ...continued

silvasaman23 Says:

Sep 20, 2012 - within the proper perspective

silvasaman23 Says:

Sep 20, 2012 - She is number one traiter kalu suddhi sent on mission by British authorities to destroy sri lanka and the Sinhalese

Alex Kumar Says:

Mar 18, 2013 - STFU!!! That is not true! Hindus are very peaceful.....have you heard of a yoga that makes people peaceful and unique....yea that originated from hindus...dont trash talk hindus when you dont know shit...I love being a hindu and will defend my religion

Channacd1 Says:

Mar 19, 2013 - She is totally lying. This is the time all Sri Lankans should stand together regardless. You're seriously a bitch.

dinapoli123 Says:

Mar 19, 2013 - Still hinduism is facists with cast system and racism , Aryans, dravidians and different races have there value . That is why lord buddah walked away from Hinduism. That is why your Great leader Ashoka ( who was born hindu, converted to buddism ) after he had lived a life with blood, and killings. Your national cymbol on your flag today is the Ashoka buddist wheel. Thanks : Lord buddah was a rebell .

WipeOutCCP Says:

Mar 19, 2013 - Agree. Buddhism is the best religion in South Asia.

dinapoli123 Says:

Mar 19, 2013 - Is Raja better? installed by CIA, sold out to the big corporations, He taking loans and more loans from IMF ( international world bank) which in the end makes our people more in deebt, more of the country will be sold out to forigners, look at south america who took so many world bank loans in the 80 and 90....used the loans to big mega projects like hambantota, airports, which only give benift to a few...the whole masses dont even can afford to take a buss to see the port.